Legal Opinion
Conti v. Board of Civil Service Commissioners
California Supreme Court
Decided December 10, 1969No. L. A. 29660Published
1Opinion of the Court
1 Cal.3d 351 (1969)
461 P.2d 617
82 Cal. Rptr. 337
ALBERT R. CONTI, Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
BOARD OF CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSIONERS OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES et al., Defendants and Appellants.
Docket No. L.A. 29660.
Supreme Court of California. In Bank.
December 10, 1969.
COUNSEL
Roger Arnebergh, City Attorney, Bourke Jones, Assistant City Attorney, Jack L. Wells and John B. Rice, Deputy City Attorneys, for Defendants and Appellants.
Arthur Lewis and Burton Marks for Plaintiff and Respondent.
OPINION
TOBRINER, J.
Petitioner[1] Albert Conti brings mandamus to compel respondents City of Los Angeles and…
2Cases cited72 opinions
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Rogers v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Maguire v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Driscoll v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.