Legal Opinion

Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance v. Birkelund

California Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1946No. L. A. 18940PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

Plaintiff insurance company filed this action in interpleader after each of the two defendants had made claim upon it for the proceeds of a policy of insurance issued by it in 1921 on the life of James R. Birkelund, now deceased. One of the defendant-claimants is Hilda Olsen Birkelund, hereinafter called Hilda, the first wife of the decedent, and the other defendant-claimant is Ruth Lillian Birkelund, hereinafter called Lillian, who also entered into a marriage with the decedent. Hilda asserts equitable claims, deriving from a property settlement agreement with James, executed in 1931,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Victor Oil Co. v. DrumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Blethen v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Brownrigg v. DefreesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Newhall v. HatchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Shoudy v. ShoudyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Abbott v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Insurance Co. of the West v. Haralambos Beverage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1987
  3. Helene Marceau Sidebotham v. W. L. Robison, Administrator of the Estate of Robert Sidebotham, Deceased, and Robert Sidebotham and James SidebothamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
  4. Packer v. Board of RetirementCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Murphy v. Travelers InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API