Legal Opinion

Carter v. South Carolina Coastal Council

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 26, 1984No. 22066PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ness, Justice:

Respondent Robert W. Carter applied for a permit to raise the elevation of approximately 5.3 acres of marshland adjacent to Scott Creek at Edisto Island in Colleton County. This request was denied by the appellant South Carolina Coastal Council. The circuit court reversed appellant’s decision.

Appellant South Carolina Coastal Council now contends the circuit court erred in concluding the Council’s original determination was (1) not supported by substantial evidence in the record; and (2) an unreasonable exercise of the State’s police power. We agree with appellant’s contention…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Goldblatt v. Town of HempsteadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Lark v. Bi-Lo, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  4. Just v. Marinette CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Graham v. Estuary Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Orion Corporation v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Grant v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  3. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  4. Gibson v. Florence Country ClubSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
  5. Sierra Club v. Kiawah Resort AssociatesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API