Orion Corporation v. State
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Utter, J. —
Orion Corporation filed this action in 1982, in part alleging an inverse condemnation by excessive regulation (regulatory taking). According to Orion, the Shoreline Management Act (SMA) and the Skagit County Shoreline Management Master Program (SCSMMP) had taken its *625Padilla Bay tideland property without just compensation. In a previous appeal, we held that Orion need not exhaust its administrative remedies because under the regulatory scheme, Orion could not obtain a permit to make any reasonably profitable use of its property. Orion Corp. v. State, 103 Wn.2d 441, 457-60, 693 P.2d…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited80 opinions
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by121 opinions
- Robinson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Allingham v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Sintra, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Presbytery of Seattle v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- Weden v. San Juan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
116 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.