Legal Opinion
Fawkes v. Farm Lands Investment Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 7, 1931No. Docket No. 344PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAMBERSON, J., pro tem.
The action is one to have declared and determined the rights of C. F. Goodwin, former plaintiff (for whom F. W. Fawkes and Hiram C. Hubbard, as executors of the Estate of. C. F. Goodwin, Deceased, have been substituted), as the owner of ten (10) shares of the preferred capital stock of the defendant corporation, and to recover cumulative dividends thereon, amounting to the sum of $426.33.
The trial court found that the principal purpose for which the defendant corporation was organized, was to buy, sell and deal in real estate; that its articles of incorporation provide…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Burne v. LeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Dominguez Land Corp. v. DaughertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Page v. Whittenton Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Westerfield-Bonte Co. v. BurnettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
- Drewry-Hughes Co. v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1917
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Levin v. Pittsburgh United Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Pas v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. West End Chemical Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940
- Verry v. EckelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Mayellen Apartments, Inc. v. PacmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.