Legal Opinion
Verry v. Eckel
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 3, 1943No. Civ. 3241PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment ordering L. H. Eckel, as Auditor of the County of Orange, to draw a warrant in favor of Lloyd S. Verry in the sum of $216.66 in settlement of a claim for vacation pay which he had earned but had not taken.
Verry was Deputy District Attorney of Orange County from twelve o’clock noon of January 2, 1939, to twelve o’clock noon on January 2, 1943. It is agreed that Verry had earned a vacation for the year ending on January 2, 1942, and another vacation for the year ending on January 2, 1943, under the provisions of Ordinance 430 of the County of Orange as amended…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mannington v. Hocking Valley Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1910
- Pohle v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. West End Chemical Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940
- Clark v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Fawkes v. Farm Lands Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Division of Labor Law Enforcement v. Ryan Aeronautical Co.California Court of Appeal · 1951
- Woodman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Bonn v. California State University, ChicoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- American Machine & Foundry Co. v. Golden State Lanes, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1967
- Martin v. HendersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.