United States v. Anderson
Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
McLAUGHLIN, Senior Judge:
We have examined the record of trial, the summary assignments of error,1 and the Gov*542ernment’s reply thereto, and we have concluded that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to the substantial rights of the appellant was committed.
Contrary to his pleas, the appellant was convicted, by a general court-martial consisting of members, of a single specification of indecent assault on a female in her home, in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934 (1994) [hereinafter UCMJ]. The…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. TurnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
- United States v. SnellingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- United States v. HealyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
- United States v. MamaluyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Marshall Kenneth Flowers v. First Hawaiian Bank, Schofield BranchCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- United States v. AndersonNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1997
- United States v. RobinsonNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1997