United States v. Robinson
Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals
1Dissent
(dissenting):
I dissent from the court’s decision to deny reconsideration en banc. In the past, the validity of the remedy afforded this accused has been of only intellectual interest. See United States v. Anderson, 46 M.J. 540 (N.M.Ct.Crim.App.l997)(Wynne, J., concurring). Today, however, we dismiss a conviction without the legal authority to do so. The mandate and authority of our court is extensive. United States v. Cole, 31 M.J. 270, 272 (C.M.A.1990). But, “the creature that our law knows as a criminal appeal is one solely of statutory origin.” United States v. Larneard, 3 M.J. 76, 79…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. ColeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
- United States v. KossmanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
- United States v. LarneardUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
- United States v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
- United States v. AndersonNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1997