Legal Opinion
Marshall Kenneth Flowers v. First Hawaiian Bank, Schofield Branch
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided July 2, 2002No. 00-15635PublishedCited by 102 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THOMPSON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Marshall Kenneth Flowers and his wife Anna Flowers (collectively the “Flowers”) brought suit pro se under the Right to Financial Privacy Act (“RFPA”), 12 U.S.C. §§ 3401-3422, against the defendant First Hawaiian Bank (“the Bank”). They alleged that the Bank violated the RFPA by producing copies of their financial records to the United States Army, pursuant to a subpoena, without first obtaining a certificate of compliance from the Army as required by the RFPA. See id. §§ 3403(b), 3407, 3411.
The primary issue in this case is whether such a certificate was…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Webster Salasker Lucas v. Department of Corrections California Men's Colony-WestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Ardestani v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- George M. Weeks, III v. Robert Bayer, Individually and in His Capacity as Director, Nevada Department of PrisonsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Nelson v. City of IrvineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- YAKAMA INDIAN NATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by102 opinions
- Platt Electrical Supply, Inc. v. Eoff Electrical, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Dennis Sharkey v. Eral O'NealCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Smallwood v. NCsoft Corp.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2010
- Swirsky v. CareyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Swirsky v. CareyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.