Legal Opinion

Demahy v. Wyeth Inc.

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided October 27, 2008No. Civil Action 08-3616PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER & REASONS

CARL J. BARBIER, District Judge.

Before the Court is Defendant Aetavis Inc.’s (“Aetavis”) Motion to Dismiss (Rec. Doc.19) under Rule 12(b)(6) based on federal conflict preemption. The motion came before the Court for oral argument on September 17, 2008, and was taken under advisement. Having reviewed the motion, the memoranda of counsel, the parties’ statements at oral argument, and the applicable law, the Court finds as follows.

FACTS & PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Plaintiff Julie Demahy (“Demahy”), a fifty-eight year old female, began taking metoclopramide, the generic version of the name…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mensing v. Wyeth, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  2. Utts v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2017
  3. Bartlett v. MUTUAL PHARMACEUTICAL CO., INC.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2009
  4. Morris v. Wyeth, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2009
  5. Wilson v. Pliva, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API