Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Pliva, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided February 20, 2009No. 5:07-mj-00378PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

THOMAS B. RUSSELL, Chief Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff Alice Wilson’s Motion for Reconsideration (Docket # 86). Defendants PLIVA, Inc. and Barr Pharmaceuticals, Inc. have responded (Docket # 91). Plaintiff has filed a reply (Docket # 92). This matter is now ripe for adjudication. For the reasons that follow, Plaintiffs Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED.

BACKGROUND

Metoclopramide is a prescription drug used to treat gastric reflux symptoms. It is the generic equivalent of Reglan, the listed drug for metoclopramide. 1 Plaintiff Alice Wilson (“Wilson”)…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. English v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Geier v. American Honda Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Heintz v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. California v. ARC America Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. United States v. LockeSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Demahy v. Actavis, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
  2. Bartlett v. MUTUAL PHARMACEUTICAL CO., INC.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2009
  3. Bartlett v. Mutual PharmaceuticalDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API