Wilson v. Pliva, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
THOMAS B. RUSSELL, Chief Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff Alice Wilson’s Motion for Reconsideration (Docket # 86). Defendants PLIVA, Inc. and Barr Pharmaceuticals, Inc. have responded (Docket # 91). Plaintiff has filed a reply (Docket # 92). This matter is now ripe for adjudication. For the reasons that follow, Plaintiffs Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED.
BACKGROUND
Metoclopramide is a prescription drug used to treat gastric reflux symptoms. It is the generic equivalent of Reglan, the listed drug for metoclopramide. 1 Plaintiff Alice Wilson (“Wilson”)…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- English v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Geier v. American Honda Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Heintz v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- California v. ARC America Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. LockeSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Demahy v. Actavis, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
- Bartlett v. MUTUAL PHARMACEUTICAL CO., INC.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2009
- Bartlett v. Mutual PharmaceuticalDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2009