Legal Opinion
Mensing v. Wyeth, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided November 27, 2009No. 08-3850PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Circuit Judge.
Gladys Mensing brought this failure to warn and misrepresentation case against a number of manufacturers of Reglan and its generic form, alleging that the medication she had taken caused her to develop tar-dive dyskinesia, a severe neurological movement disorder. The manufacturers moved for summary judgment and dismissal. The district court dismissed her claims against the generic defendants on the basis of federal preemption and against the name brand manufacturers on the basis that she had not taken their products. Mensing appeals, and we affirm the judgment in favor…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Wyeth v. LevineSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Crosby v. National Foreign Trade CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Bates v. Dow Agrosciences LLCSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- PLIVA, Inc. v. MensingSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Mut. Pharm. Co. v. BartlettSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Schrock v. Wyeth, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Sarah Speed v. Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Mutual Pharmaceutical Co. v. BartlettSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.