Boise City v. Sinsel
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
PORTER, Justice.
By this action, appellant seeks a mandatory injunction commanding respondents to eliminate and remove an encroachment and obstruction consisting of part of a building, situate upon a public street of Boise City, and seeks a permanent injunction restraining respondents from obstructing such street. The cause was tried to the court sitting without a jury. The court' made findings of fact, contusions of law and entered judgment dismissing the action. From such judgment appellant appeals to this court.
The controlling facts in this case are not seriously contested. In the year 1867…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Town of Chouteau v. BlankenshipSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
- Boise City v. WilkinsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
- Yellow Cab Taxi Service v. City of Twin FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1948
- Boise City v. HonIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
- City of Emporia v. HumphreySupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Infanger v. City of SalmonIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
- State Ex Rel. Rich v. Idaho Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1959
- Schneider v. HoweIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
- Harrell v. City of LewistonIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
- Evans v. JensenIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.