Legal Opinion
Flinn & Treacy v. Mowry
California Supreme Court
Decided January 29, 1901No. S.F. No. 1604PublishedCited by 17 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The plaintiffs entered into a contract with the defendant to do certain work upon Laguna street, in San Francisco, in front of her property, and brought the present action to recover after its completion the amount agreed to be paid by her, and to have the same decreed a lien upon her property. The court rendered its decision in favor of the plaintiffs, giving them a lien upon one parcel of the plaintiffs' land for a portion of their claim and a personal…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Duff v. DuffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- City & County of San Francisco v. BuckmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by17 opinions
- Hollywood Cleaning & Pressing Co. v. Hollywood Laundry Service, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1932
- Evans v. DavidsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
- University of Southern California v. BrysonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Mary Troutfelt Cohen, Mary Troutfelt Cohen v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
- Stephan Riess and Thelma McKinney Riess, and Cross-Appellees v. C. W. Murchison and Simi Valley Development Company, and Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.