Legal Opinion

City of Turlock v. Bristow

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 7, 1930No. Docket No. 3865PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON (R. L.), J.

This is an appeal from a decree awarding mandatory relief from a public nuisance caused by the pollution of the water of an irrigation ditch which extends through a portion of the City of Turlock.

For more than twenty years the defendants held an easement in the use of water for irrigation purposes which flowed in a ditch extending through the westerly portion of the City of Turlock. Originally this ditch which was constructed with dirt embankments, was entirely uninclosed by culverts or conduits. The ditch was ten or fifteen feet in width and several feet in depth. It…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Strong v. SullivanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Sullivan v. RoyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Pennsylvania R. R. v. Sagamore Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Ex parte TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. McCarthy v. Gaston Ridge Mill & Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1904

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Mangini v. Aerojet-General Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1991
  2. Hartman Ranch Co. v. Associated Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Leslie Salt Co. v. San Francisco Bay Conservation & Development CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. Wade v. CampbellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Helix Land Co. v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API