Legal Opinion
State v. Reynolds
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided February 3, 1984No. 82-059PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBatchelder, J.
The defendant was indicted for unlawfully retaining stolen firearms (RSA 637:11, 1(b)). After a jury trial in Superior Court (Souter, J.), he was found guilty. Before trial, the defendant moved to suppress certain statements and physical evidence gathered as a result of those statements. The Superior Court (.Dalianis, J.) denied those motions, finding that the defendant’s waiver of his Miranda rights was voluntary beyond a reasonable doubt. The statements and the physical evidence were admitted into evidence at the trial. The defendant appeals from the denial of his motion to suppress and…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Michigan v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- North Carolina v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. DellorfanoSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
- State v. FaragiSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
- State v. CarrollSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
- State v. FordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
- State v. ElbertSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.