Legal Opinion
State v. Dellorfano
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided October 3, 1986No. 85-229PublishedCited by 93 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKing, C.J.
The defendant was tried by a jury and convicted on charges of accomplice to armed robbery, RSA 636:1,111(a) and RSA 626:8, III; accomplice to kidnapping, RSA 633:1 and RSA 626:8, III; and possession of a controlled drug, second offense, RSA 318-B:26, 1(b)(2). During trial, the Court {Bean, J.) overruled the defendant’s objection to the admission of certain statements made to the police before and after Miranda warnings. This ruling, and the court’s failure to give a particular accomplice testimony instruction, are challenged on appeal. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
Shortly after…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Frazier v. CuppSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by93 opinions
- State v. VandebogartSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
- In re GrimmSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- State v. ValenzuelaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
- State v. FordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
- State v. GravelSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.