Legal Opinion
State v. Ford
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided July 21, 1999No. 97-617PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHorton, J.
The defendant, Scott Ford, was convicted, inter alia, of one count of robbery armed with a deadly weapon, see RSA 636:1 (1997), and two counts of theft by unauthorized taking, see RSA 637:3 (1997). He appeals, arguing that the Superior Court (Murphy, J.) erred in denying his motion to suppress confessions made while he was in prison and in both convicting and sentencing him for robbery and theft as separate offenses. We affirm.
*59In August 1995, the defendant agreed to participate in a staged robbery of a jewelry store in Hampton Beach, with the cooperation of the store owner, as part of an…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Herrera v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- People v. MathenySupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- Clark v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
- State v. LockeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
- State v. HammondSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.