Legal Opinion
Thielking v. Kirschner
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided September 7, 1993No. 1 CA-CV 90-584PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FIDEL, Judge.
We hold in this appeal that Rule 6(e), Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure, extends the time for filing a superior court complaint seeking judicial review of an administrative decision when the decision has been served by mail. In doing so, we reconsider and reject the analysis of United Farm Workers v. Arizona Agricultural Em ployment Relations Board, 149 Ariz. 70, 716 P.2d 439 (App.1986).
I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Plaintiff/appellant Nora Thielking (Thielking) received medical care through Mercy Care Plan (Mercy), a health plan within the Arizona Health Care Cost Containment…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Texie G. Carr v. The Veterans Administration, and J. G. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Woodrow and Betty Frey v. Gerald Dean Woodard, Joe McCracken and the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Scappaticci v. Southwest Savings & Loan Ass'nArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Tanner Companies v. Arizona State Land DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- Arizona Board of Regents v. HarperArizona Supreme Court · 1972
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Fragoso v. FellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
- Smith v. Arizona Citizens Clean Elections CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 2006
- Graf v. WhitakerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
- State v. CabreraCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- State v. CountermanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.