Legal Opinion
Tanner Companies v. Arizona State Land Department
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided July 18, 1984No. 2 CA-CIV 4798PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOWARD, Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment entered in favor of appellees after a trial de novo in an administrative appeal pursuant to former A.R.S. § 37-134 and § 37-214(D).
The record shows that Tanner Companies (Tanner) held a 20-year mineral lease on state trust land, lease No. M-908. Clinton Campbell held similar leases, M-1022, M-1456 and M-1457. The mineral compound involved in the leases was Pantano clays. The Pantano formation is a lake deposit, as distinguished from a stream deposit, of ordinary clay and clay materials. It only appears in a small area of Pima County.…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Public Serv. Comm'n of Utah v. Wycoff Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- State of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- United States v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Carrel v. LuxArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- Mendelsohn v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1953
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Schade v. DiethrichArizona Supreme Court · 1988
- Gilbert v. Board of Medical ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
- Havasu Heights Ranch & Development Corp. v. Desert Valley Wood Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
- Phoenix Control System, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Lewis v. N.J. Riebe Enterprises, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1992
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.