Legal Opinion
Denley v. Oregon Automobile Insurance
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided April 17, 1935PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.
The plaintiff, Bichard Denley, instituted this action to recover from the defendant, Oregon Automobile Insurance Company, a corporation, the sum of $5,107.45, with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from September 22, 1933, and the further sum of $500, attorneys? fees. The action is based on.a policy of casualty insurance issued by the defendant corporation to the county of Yamhill, on a Pontiac automobile. The sum prayed for in the complaint, less attorneys’ fees, is the amount of a judgment recovered by this plaintiff against B. J. Kennedy, county judge of Yamhill…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Imperial Fire Insurance v. Coos CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Stovall v. New York Indemnity Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1928
- Dickinson v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
- Odden v. Union Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1930
- Drewek v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Chalmers v. OREGON AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1972
- National Union Fire Insurance v. CarmicalCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
- Ryan v. Western Pacific InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1965
- Northwest Marine Iron Works v. Western Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. BrewerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.