Legal Opinion
Odden v. Union Indemnity Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Decided March 17, 1930No. 22121. Department OnePublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
The plaintiff Odden seeks recovery upon an automobile accident liability policy of insurance issued by the defendant indemnity company, claiming to be a beneficiary thereunder by virtue of its terms and his being injured while riding in the insured automobile as the result of the negligence of its driver. A trial upon the merits in the superior court for King county, sitting without a jury, resulted in findings and judgment awarding to Odden recovery in the sum of $2,778 against the indemnity company, from which it has appealed to this court.
The indemnity company, being duly authorized to do…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Messersmith v. . American Fidelity Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Stovall v. New York Indemnity Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1928
- Dickinson v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
- McMahon v. PearlmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- Fireman's Fund Ins. Co. v. HaleyMississippi Supreme Court · 1922
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Konrad v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1956
- Kautz v. Zurich General Accident & Liability InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Haynes v. LinderMissouri Court of Appeals · 1959
- Hays v. Country Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
- Norris v. Pacific Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1952
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.