Legal Opinion

Chalmers v. OREGON AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1972PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTongue, J.

Plaintiffs’ attorneys have filed a petition for allowance of attorney fees under OB.S 743.114. That statute provides that in an action upon a policy of insurance in which plaintiffs’ recovery exceeds the amount of any tender, a reasonable amount shall be allowed as attorney fees both on trial and on appeal.

Plaintiffs’ petition states that “[t]he fee arrangement between the plaintiff-appellants and their attorneys was on a contingent fee based upon the allowance of attorney fees under statute on suits involving insurance contracts.” Neither the percentage of the contingent fee arrangement nor…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Denley v. Oregon Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Bivvins v. UngerOregon Supreme Court · 1972

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Phillips v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  2. SCHOOL DIST. NO. 1, ETC. v. Mission Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  3. Strawn v. Farmers InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Nellie Kabatoff v. Safeco Insurance Company of America, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  5. Stumpf v. Continental Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API