Ryan v. Western Pacific Insurance
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.
The issue is whether the negligent driver was a permissive user and thereby covered under the omnibus clause of the comprehensive liability policy issued by defendant.
The defendant’s policy named Tum-A-Lum Lumber Company and other business concerns and individuals as the named insureds. Paragraph III of the insuring agreement of the policy provides:
“DEFINITION OF ‘INSURED’: The unqualified word ‘insured’ wherever used includes not *86only the named insured but also * * * (3) any person while using an automobile owned or hired by the named insured or spouse and any person or organization legally…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Dickinson v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
- Schuncke v. Pennsylvania Threshermen & Farmers' Mutual Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeOregon Supreme Court · 1964
- In Re Vilas' EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1941
- Phoenix Indemnity Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Moore v. Mutual of Enumclaw InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Milbank Mutual Insurance Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Jordan v. Consolidated Mutual InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Columbia Casualty Co. v. HoohuliHawaii Supreme Court · 1968
- Travelers Indemnity Company v. WatkinsMississippi Supreme Court · 1968
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.