Legal Opinion
Dickinson v. Maryland Casualty Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 28, 1924PublishedCited by 119 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
In April, 1921, Donato Maisano of New Haven was the owner of a Westcott automobile, and procured from the defendant company a policy of insurance containing the following provisions covering the persons, firms or corporations insured under the policy:
Clause I. “ To insure said named Assured, in accordance with the provisions of said General Agreements, as respects the automobile owned or operated by the named Assured and listed in said General Agreements.”
Clause II. “The insurance provided by this policy is so extended as to be available, in the same manner and under the same conditions as it…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance v. KearneySupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Dresser v. Hartford Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
- Boon v. Ætna InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1873
- Barnes v. Dirigo Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1923
- Smith v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by119 opinions
- Stovall v. New York Indemnity Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1928
- Matits v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Konrad v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1956
- Brower v. Employers' Liability Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Raffel v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.