Bennett v. State Industrial Accident Commission
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.
The attorney general, appearing for the respondent, State Industrial Accident Commission, moved for a continuance of the oral argument of this case on the ground that Mr. Ben Anderson, of the firm of Anderson, Franklin & Landye, who are attorneys of record for the appellant, is a member of the legislative assembly and in his representation of the appellant is acting in contravention of Art. XV, § 7 of the Constitution, which reads:
“No state officers or members of the legislative assembly shall directly or indirectly receive *277a fee, or be engaged as counsel, agent, or attorney in the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Butterfield v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1924
- Eastern & Western Lumber Co. v. PattersonOregon Supreme Court · 1927
- United Contracting Co. v. DubyOregon Supreme Court · 1930
- Mohler Et Ux. v. Fish CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1929
- Pacific Fruit & Produce Co. v. Oregon Liquor Control CommissionDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1941
3Cited by9 opinions
- Mark v. STATE, DEPT. OF FISH AND WILDLIFECourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- Sprague v. StraubOregon Supreme Court · 1969
- Johnson v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 2007
- Manning v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1963
- Johnson v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.