Legal Opinion

Eastern & Western Lumber Co. v. Patterson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1927PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

The plaintiffs specifically point out that the act' in question offends against the constitutional provision reading:

‘ ‘ The Legislative Assembly shall not lend the credit of the state nor in any manner create any debt or liabilities which shall singly or in the aggregate with previous debts or liabilities exceed the sum of $50,000 * * . ” Or. Const., Art. XI, § 7.

Are the plaintiffs proper parties to question the validity of the act under consideration? This is the first question to be determined. It is well settled in this state that only persons who may be injured by its operation may…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. The Minnesota Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Stuart v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  3. Chicago & Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. WellmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. Quong Wing v. KirkendallSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  5. Litchfield v. BallouSupreme Court of the United States · 1885

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Eckles v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Baker v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  3. Fox v. GallowayOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Jory v. MartinOregon Supreme Court · 1936
  5. State Ex Rel. Overhulse v. ApplingOregon Supreme Court · 1961

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API