Legal Opinion
Pacific Fruit & Produce Co. v. Oregon Liquor Control Commission
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided September 29, 1941No. Civil No. 217PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES ALGER FEE, District Judge.
The complaint in this action seeks recovery of amounts paid by plaintiff for the privilege of doing business in malt syrups in the State of Oregon. There are forty-one counts in the complaint, each based upon a separate payment to the Oregon Liquor Control Commission during the period from April 25, 1934, to November 19, 1938. The forty-second count sets up that *177defendants are seeking collection of like sums claimed to be due for such business transacted in the period before the repeal of this section of the statute1 and during the months of January to March,…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Smyth v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Federal Housing Administration, Region No. 4 v. BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Ex Parte State of New York, No. 1Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Reagan v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Smyth v. Ames; Smyth v. Smith; Smyth v. HigginsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- DeLong Corporation v. Oregon State Highway Com'nDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1964
- State Ex Rel. Morrison v. ThomasArizona Supreme Court · 1956
- Naomi Petty, Administratrix of the Estate of Faye R. Petty, Deceased v. Tennessee-Missouri Bridge Commission, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1958
- Bennett v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1955
- White v. Umatilla CountyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.