Johnson v. SAIF Corp.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.
Plaintiff initiated this action under 42 USC section 1983 against defendants SAIF Corporation and its president and chief executive officer, alleging that defendants deprived him of his right to due process under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution by terminating his permanent total disability workers’ compensation benefits without a pretermination hearing. Defendants sought, and the trial court granted, summary judgment on the ground that SAIF is not a “person” subject to liability under section 1983.
Plaintiff appealed, arguing that SAIF indeed is a “person” within the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Howlett Ex Rel. Howlett v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2001
- Butterfield v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1924
- Kinross Copper Corp. v. State of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- Gunn v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Progressive Party of Oregon v. AtkinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- Johnson v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 2007
- Norgaard v. Port of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008