Legal Opinion
In Re Forster
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided December 3, 1993No. 19-60392PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS CASE
WALTER J. KRASNIEWSKI, Bankruptcy Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the United States Trustee’s (“UST”) motion to convert or dismiss Wilhelm Forster’s (the “DIP”) chapter 11 case. The state of Ohio (“State”), Putnam County General Health District (“County”) and the Union Bank Company (“Bank”) joined in this motion. The DIP and Bowser-Morner Associates, Inc. (“Bowser-Morner”) opposed the UST’s motion. The Court finds that the UST’s motion is well taken and that the DIP’s chapter 11 case should be dismissed.
PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
In a prior…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Ford Motor Credit Company v. Robert L. Weaver, John C. Weaver and Sons and Weaver Farms, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- Bankr. L. Rep. P 74,995 in Re Lawrence S. Charfoos, Debtor. Michigan National Bank v. Lawrence S. CharfoosCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re Continental Holdings, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1994
- In Re ABEPP Acquisition Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1996