Legal Opinion

Holland v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided April 17, 2009No. 95-524 CPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

GEORGE W. MILLER, Judge.

After extended proceedings, plaintiffs have prevailed regarding both liability for breach of contract and an award of damages in this Winstar-related proceeding. The defendant’s counterclaims remain to be resolved. The plaintiffs have now moved to dismiss the counterclaims, which assert that defendant is entitled to damages for plaintiffs’ breach of the covenant not to sue or is entitled to a setoff of amounts paid to plaintiffs under a previous settlement agreement between the plaintiffs and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) as…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Holland v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
  2. Adde v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  3. McKenna v. PoissonSuperior Court of Rhode Island · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API