Modern Cigarette, Inc. v. Town of Orange
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KATZ, J.
The sole issue in this appeal is whether an ordinance adopted by the named defendant, the town of Orange (town), banning all cigarette vending machines within its borders (ordinance) is preempted by General *107Statutes § 12-289a.1 The trial court concluded that state law preempted the ordinance. Accordingly, the trial court declared the ordinance invalid and enjoined the town from enforcing it. Because we determine that § 12-289a does not prohibit the town, acting within its pow*108ers to protect the health, safely and welfare of its citizens, from banning all cigarette vending…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Willow Springs Condominium Ass'n v. Seventh BRT Development Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Packer Corp. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Aaron v. Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Dunagin v. City of OxfordCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Kron v. ThelenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Giulietti v. GiuliettiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Harris v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Lyon v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- State v. LuttersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.