Legal Opinion

Sherwin v. Ladd

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 3, 1921PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Petition to the Supreme Court for Chittenden County for a writ of mandamus to compel a former judge of the Burlington City Court to sign a bill of exceptions in a cause heard and determined by him. Heard on petitionees’ demurrer to petitioner’s replication. The opinion states the ease.

1Opinion of the CourtSlack, J.

This is a petition for a writ of mandamus to compel a former judge of the Burlington city court to sign a bill of exceptions in a cause heard and determined by him, wherein one Brown was plaintiff, and this petitioner was defendant. The instant case was heard on demurrer to the replication.

[1, 2] The petition alleges that the original action was account; that before hearing the defendant, petitioner herein, moved for a trial by jury, insisting that she was entitled thereto under No. 91, Acts 1915, § 12 (G. L. 1651), which provides that, “In civil causes, either party shall be entitled to a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hotel Vermont Co. v. CosgriffSupreme Court of Vermont · 1915
  2. Mead v. Town of MoretownSupreme Court of Vermont · 1900
  3. Goodfriend v. Henry Bodenheimer Real Estate Light & Power Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1921
  4. Jones v. MetcalfSupreme Court of Vermont · 1921
  5. State v. PlumleySupreme Court of Vermont · 1910

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Matter of Mae Disorda SavageSupreme Court of Vermont · 1941
  2. Falzarano v. DemassoSupreme Court of Vermont · 1924
  3. Notte v. Rutland Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1942
  4. Baldwin v. MorseSupreme Court of Vermont · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API