Legal Opinion
Notte v. Rutland Railroad Co.
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided January 13, 1942PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSherburne, J.
The question for consideration here is raised by a» motion to dismiss the exceptions to an award of the Commissioner of Industrial Relations. The award was made and copies thereof were sent to the parties on November 4, 1941. The bill of exceptions was filed on November 25, 1941. The ground of the motion is that the bill of exceptions was not seasonably filed.
No. 34 of the Acts of 1941, entitled “An Act to Standardize the Passings of Causes to the Supreme Court,” provides as follows:
“Section 1. In all causes before the court of chancery, probate court, public service commission, commissioner…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Legg v. BrittonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1890
- Sorrell v. WhiteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1931
- Sawyer v. North American Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1874
- Whitcomb v. RoodSupreme Court of Vermont · 1847
- Newman v. GarfieldSupreme Court of Vermont · 1918
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Billado v. Control CommissionersSupreme Court of Vermont · 1946
- Abel's, Inc. v. NewtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1950
- Rutland Cable T v. Inc. v. City of RutlandSupreme Court of Vermont · 1960
- Nelson v. Public Service CommissionersSupreme Court of Vermont · 1951
- Planned Parenthood of Vermont, Inc. v. City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.