State v. Plumley
Supreme Court of Vermont
Petition for a writ of mandamus, preferred to the Supreme Court for Rutland County at its May Term, 1910, and then heard on the petition and answers. The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the CourtWatson, J.
This case was heard on the petition and the answers. The material facts alleged in the petition are, that at its last annual meeting the city of Rutland voted that licenses should be granted for the sale of intoxicating liquor therein; that the respondents, then and hitherto the assistant judges of the county court in the county of Rutland, did not within sixteen days after the city so voted, nor at any subsequent time, appoint a board of license commissioners for said city, as required by section 5109 of the Public Statutes. These facts thus alleged are admitted to be true by the several…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Secretary v. McGarrahanSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Clement v. GrahamSupreme Court of Vermont · 1906
- United States v. LawrenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1795
- People ex rel. Hemstreet v. CrabbIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
- Richards, Truesdell & Co. v. WheelerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1827
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sabre v. Rutland RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1913
- Sanborn v. WeirSupreme Court of Vermont · 1921
- Town of Salisbury v. ButtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
- Crystal Brook Farm, Inc. v. Control CommissionersSupreme Court of Vermont · 1933
- Gaffney v. Commissioners of Jail DeliverySupreme Court of Vermont · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.