Legal Opinion
Matter of Mae Disorda Savage
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided October 7, 1941PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Per curiam
This is a petition for a writ of mandamus to compel the respondents, the Commissioners of Jail Delivery for the County of Rutland, to admit the relator to the poor debtor’s oath. The Commissioners have been served with the petition and have notified us that they do not desire to be heard.
The relator has been confined in close jail upon a certified execution granted after a judgment obtained against her in an action of tort at the March Term, 1940, of Rutland County Court and affirmed in this Court at the November Term, 1940. See Callahan v. Disorda, 111 Vt. 331, 16 Atl. 2d. 179. The execution…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- National Bank of Newport v. National Herkimer County Bank of Little FallsSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Continental & Commercial Trust & Savings Bank v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Van Iderstine v. National Discount Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Dunnett v. Shields and ConantSupreme Court of Vermont · 1924
- Grout v. GatesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1924
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Bargman v. BrewerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1983
- Town of Glover v. AndersonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1957
- Rose v. MorrellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1969
- Office of the Auditor of Accounts v. Office of the Attorney GeneralSupreme Court of Vermont · 2025
- Headid v. RodmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.