Legal Opinion

Behneman v. Schoemer

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1927No. 20105. Department OnePublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

On October 23,1923, the original complaint was filed in the lower court by appellant against respondents named therein, seeking ah accounting from respondents, setting up a contract between them entered into October 19, 1917, for the purpose of reorganizing and operating a failing, or near failing, business, until tbe business should be made to pay, or, as the contract expressed it, “showed a surplus.” Among other things, that complaint alleged that appellant had done and performed all things by him to be performed pursuant to the contract; that the business had been put upon a paying basis;…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Dormitzer v. German Savings & Loan SocietyWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Hubenthal v. Spokane & Inland Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Gerard-Fillio Co. v. McNairWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Taylor v. Interstate Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Babcock, Cornish & Co. v. UrquhartWashington Supreme Court · 1909

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Starks v. FieldWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Labor Hall Ass'n, Inc. v. DanielsenWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Debritz v. SylviaWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Peterson v. Pacific Steamship Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API