Salibello v. Oregon Board of Optometry
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtFlynn, J.
This appeal arises out of an action under the Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act, ORS 28.010 to 28.160. The trial court required the Oregon Board of Optometry to provide to plaintiff, Cosmo Salibello, a copy of the complaint that prompted a board investigation of Salibello’s practices and a copy of the investigation summary that the board prepared after closing the investigation. The board argues that the Oregon Administrative Procedures Act (APA) provides the exclusive process for plaintiff to obtain the judicial intervention he seeks and, thus, the trial court lacked jurisdiction to enter…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Couey v. AtkinsOregon Supreme Court · 2015
- League of Oregon Cities v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2002
- Morgan v. Sisters School District 6Oregon Supreme Court · 2013
- Norden v. STATE, WATER RESOURCES DEPT.Oregon Supreme Court · 2000
- Savage v. MunnOregon Supreme Court · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Murphy v. Oregon Medical BoardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
- Reeves v. WagnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
- Atwood v. Dept. of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026
- Atwood v. Dept. of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026
- Hayes Oyster Co. v. Dept. of AgricultureCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.