Lindholm v. Northwestern Pacific Railroad
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.
An appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of nonsuit in an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff as a result of the alleged negligent acts of defendant’s employees.
The correctness of the trial court’s ruling on the motion for nonsuit depends mainly upon the determination of the question of whether appellant, at the time he received the injuries, was, as he claims, an invited licensee upon the premises where the accident occurred, or was, as the trial court declared by its judgment of nonsuit, “a trespasser or at best a bare licensee.”
The following are the facts:…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Pauckner v. WakemIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MeansIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
- Means v. Southern California Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
- Schmidt v. BauerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Galveston Oil Co. v. MortonTexas Supreme Court · 1888
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Oettinger v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Palmquist v. MercerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Demmer v. City of EurekaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- McPheters v. LoomisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
- Langazo v. San Joaquin Light & Power Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1939
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.