Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Means
Indiana Court of Appeals
Prom Superior Court of Marion County (82,554); Willard New, Judge Pro Tem. Action by Hannah. Means against The Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago and St. Louis Railway Company. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtHottel, J.
This was a suit by appellee to recover damages for the death of her infant son, alleged to have been caused by appellant’s negligence. A complaint and an answer of general denial presented the issues of fact. A trial by jury resulted in a verdict for appellee for $400. A demurrer to the complaint, a motion for a peremptory instruction, and a motion for a new trial were each overruled and these several rulings are each separately assigned as error, and relied on for reversal.
1. Appellee insists that appellant has waived the error, if any, resulting from the ruling on the demurrer to the…
2Cases cited78 opinions
- Plummer v. DillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
- Beck v. . CarterNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Carleton v. Franconia Iron & Steel Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- Faris v. HobergIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Nicholson v. . the Erie Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1870
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by78 opinions
- Burrell v. MeadsIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
- Neal, Admr. v. Home Builders, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1953
- Crossgrove v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Wozniczka v. McKEANIndiana Court of Appeals · 1969
- Swanson v. ShroatIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.