James Hardie Gypsum (Nevada) Inc. v. Inquipco
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Appellant, James Hardie Gypsum, Inc. (“Hardie”), entered into an oral rental agreement with Inquipco for a boom crane truck. Thereafter, the truck was damaged while being operated by a Hardie employee.
Inquipco sued Hardie for loss of rental income, moving expenses, investigation charges and attorney’s fees. The district court, sitting without a jury, entered judgment for Inquipco. Hardie appealed, contending that the trial court erred in finding that the parties entered into an oral agreement with a written modification. In the alternative, Hardie maintains that the lower court erred…
3Cases cited16 opinions
- State Employment Security Department v. Hilton Hotels Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1986
- Valencia v. Shell Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
- Mullen v. ChristiansenAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
- Rowland v. LepireNevada Supreme Court · 1983
- Paradise Homes, Inc. v. Central Surety and Ins. Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1968
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by8 opinions
- May v. AndersonNevada Supreme Court · 2005
- Sandy Valley Associates v. Sky Ranch Estates Owners Ass'nNevada Supreme Court · 2001
- MacK v. Estate of MacKNevada Supreme Court · 2009
- Kaiser v. Millard Lumber, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1999
- Kerala Properties, Inc. v. FamilianNevada Supreme Court · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.