Legal Opinion

Paradise Homes, Inc. v. Central Surety and Ins. Corp.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1968No. 5343PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Collins, J.:

This is a contract action. The only issue with which we are concerned on appeal involves the question of interest. The trial court limited the recovery of interest to the time of judgment. We conclude that to be error, reverse the order and remand with direction.

Paradise Homes entered into a subcontract with Jamieson Drywall and Paint Company, a partnership, wherein Jamieson agreed to perform labor and supply material to Paradise valued at $133,800. Central Surety provided a performance bond for Jamieson.

Jamieson experienced difficulty in performing its…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. O'MEARA v. Commercial Insurance CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  2. President, Directors & Co. of Rensselaer Glass Factory v. ReidCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1825
  3. Agricultural Insurance Co. of Watertown v. BiltzNevada Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Sierra Pacific Power Company v. NyeNevada Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Vietti v. NesbittNevada Supreme Court · 1895

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. M.C. Multi-Family Development, L.L.C. v. Crestdale Associates, Ltd.Nevada Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Stee v. "L" Monte Industries, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Brandon v. TravitskyNevada Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Gibellini v. KlindtNevada Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. ChristensenNevada Supreme Court · 1972

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API