Legal Opinion

Kerala Properties, Inc. v. Familian

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 2006No. 44938PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This is the fourth appeal concerning the same underlying suit between appellant Kerala Properties, Inc., and respondent Bruce Familian. Familian contracted with Kerala to purchase a parcel of Kerala’s land. Kerala breached the contract and Familian sued for specific performance. Because of the property’s value, Familian was not entitled to specific performance but was entitled to monetary damages. In accordance with our previous order, the district court awarded Familian attorney fees, other expenses, and prejudgment and postjudgment interest. The parties agreed that the applicable…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sandy Valley Associates v. Sky Ranch Estates Owners Ass'nNevada Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Paradise Homes, Inc. v. Central Surety and Ins. Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Brandon v. TravitskyNevada Supreme Court · 1970
  4. City Plan Development, Inc. v. Office of the Labor CommissionerNevada Supreme Court · 2005
  5. James Hardie Gypsum (Nevada) Inc. v. InquipcoNevada Supreme Court · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by17 opinions

  1. In Re USA Commercial Mortg. Co.District Court, D. Nevada · 2011
  2. Alutiiq International Solutions, LLC v. OIC Marianas InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2016
  3. D.E. Shaw Laminar Portfolios, LLC v. Archon Corp.District Court, D. Nevada · 2010
  4. Schiff v. WinchellNevada Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Leeward Capital, L.P. v. Archon Corp.District Court, D. Nevada · 2010

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API