May v. Anderson
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court, Hardesty, J. :
In this case, all parties agreed to the essential terms of a release in reaching a global settlement, but three parties later refused to execute the release document. We therefore consider whether the essential terms of a release are a material part of a settlement agreement, without which the settlement agreement is never formed, or whether the release’s terms are inconsequential in determining whether the parties have reached a settlement agreement. We conclude that the release’s essential terms are material and therefore required for an enforceable…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Claire E. Doi v. Halekulani Corporation, Dba Waikiki Parc HotelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Chappell v. RothSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
- Sandy Valley Associates v. Sky Ranch Estates Owners Ass'nNevada Supreme Court · 2001
- Bayou Fleet, Inc. v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Cheverie v. GeisserDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by183 opinions
- Certified Fire Protection, Inc. v. Precision Construction, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2012
- Galardi v. Naples Polaris, L.L.C.Nevada Supreme Court · 2013
- In Re Amerco Derivative LitigationNevada Supreme Court · 2011
- Anvui, LLC v. G.L. Dragon, LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2007
- Glenbrook Capital Ltd. Partnership v. DoddsNevada Supreme Court · 2011
178 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.