Legal Opinion

Fournier v. Estate of Loiselle

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 1, 1974No. 170-73PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKeyser, J.

Plaintiff was injured when the car in which he was a passenger was struck from behind by an automobile operated by defendant’s decedent, Armand Loiselle. Mr. Loiselle died within a few days of the accident, and this suit was subsequently brought against his estate. The cause was tried before a jury, and a verdict based upon decedent’s negligence was returned in favor of plaintiff in the amount of $1,200.00. Plaintiff now brings this appeal contending that the verdict is nominal and was compromised as a result of improper admission of certain expert medical testimony offered by defendant. This…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Largess v. TatemSupreme Court of Vermont · 1972
  2. Parizo v. WilsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1929
  3. Merrill v. ReedSupreme Court of Vermont · 1962
  4. Quesnel v. RaleighSupreme Court of Vermont · 1969
  5. Steele v. LackeySupreme Court of Vermont · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ball v. Melsur Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  2. Lorrain v. RyanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  3. Mattison v. PoulenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1976
  4. Grazulis v. CurtisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  5. Paul Epsom and Kristine Kelley v. David S. Crandall and Mark JohnsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API