Legal Opinion
Grazulis v. Curtis
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided February 26, 1988No. 86-258PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.
This negligence action arose out of an automobile accident at the corner of Main and High Streets in Brattleboro. Plaintiff appeals from a jury verdict in his favor arguing that the damage award was inadequate, in part because the trial judge charged the jury that it could consider the negligence of the plaintiff in determining the damages to award him. We affirm.
Plaintiff alleged that he was waiting at a traffic light when defendant negligently turned his vehicle into plaintiff’s lane of traffic and struck him. As a result of this accident, plaintiff alleged that several bottles of sulfuric…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Smith v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.District Court, D. Vermont · 1985
- Kerr v. RollinsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1970
- Paton v. SawyerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1976
- Frost v. TisbertSupreme Court of Vermont · 1977
- Sachse v. LumleySupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Ball v. Melsur Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1993
- Langlois v. Town of ProctorSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
- Hartnett v. Union Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
- Imported Car Center, Inc. v. BillingsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
- Paul Epsom and Kristine Kelley v. David S. Crandall and Mark JohnsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2019
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.