Legal Opinion

Ball v. Melsur Corp.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided September 24, 1993No. 92-487PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Allen, CJ.

Defendant Melsur Corporation appeals an adverse judgment in a personal injury case and seeks a new trial. Defendant claims that: (1) the administrative judge for the trial courts committed reversible error when he denied defendant’s motion for recusal; (2) the trial court committed reversible er ror when it allowed plaintiffs to present evidence of certain OSHA/VOSHA standards and their alleged violation; (3) the jury verdict was a result of passion, caprice, prejudice, compromise, or some other consideration; and (4) the trial judge demonstrated prejudice in favor of plaintiffs…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Alamo National Bank v. KrausTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. State v. HuntSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  4. Leonard v. WillcoxSupreme Court of Vermont · 1928
  5. Richard v. RichardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. Rogers v. BradleyTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Demag v. Better Power Equipment, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2014
  3. Lamb v. GeovjianSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
  4. Scott v. Matlack, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  5. State v. DannSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API