Ball v. Melsur Corp.
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the Court
Allen, CJ.
Defendant Melsur Corporation appeals an adverse judgment in a personal injury case and seeks a new trial. Defendant claims that: (1) the administrative judge for the trial courts committed reversible error when he denied defendant’s motion for recusal; (2) the trial court committed reversible er ror when it allowed plaintiffs to present evidence of certain OSHA/VOSHA standards and their alleged violation; (3) the jury verdict was a result of passion, caprice, prejudice, compromise, or some other consideration; and (4) the trial judge demonstrated prejudice in favor of plaintiffs…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Alamo National Bank v. KrausTexas Supreme Court · 1981
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- State v. HuntSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
- Leonard v. WillcoxSupreme Court of Vermont · 1928
- Richard v. RichardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- Rogers v. BradleyTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Demag v. Better Power Equipment, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2014
- Lamb v. GeovjianSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
- Scott v. Matlack, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- State v. DannSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.