Legal Opinion

Lorrain v. Ryan

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided April 16, 1993No. 92-238PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dooley,' J.

Plaintiffs Derek and Patricia Lorrain appeal the rulings of the Chittenden Superior Court on two post-judgment motions. The trial court (1) denied plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial on the issue of damages, in which plaintiffs argued that defendants failed to produce sufficient evidence for the jury to apportion damages and that the award of damages was grossly inadequate; and (2) granted defendants’ motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict, in which defendants asserted that a damage award for loss of consortium was barred by the exclusivity provision of the workers’…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Bazley v. TortorichSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
  2. In re S.B.L.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  3. Silva v. StevensSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  4. Libercent v. AldrichSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
  5. Howley v. KantorSupreme Court of Vermont · 1933

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Baker v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  2. Brueckner v. Norwich UniversitySupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  3. Winey v. William E. Dailey, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  4. Gallipo v. City of RutlandSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
  5. Brigham v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API