Legal Opinion

Davis v. Carroll

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 29, 2013No. 09 Civ. 1088 (JPO)PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

J. PAUL OETKEN, District Judge:

This case arises from scandal in the elite world of New York’s fine art galleries. Plaintiff Earl Davis entrusted artworks produced by his father, the influential American modernist painter Stuart Davis, to Salander O’Reilly Galleries (“SOG”). Unbeknownst to Davis, SOG was caught in a vast web of unethical and illegal dealings that ultimately resulted in a criminal con1 viction. Before SOG’s house of cards collapsed, its principal, Lawrence Salander, engaged in a series of major transactions with Defendant Joseph P. Carroll. Over four months…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Scott v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
  2. Hulett v. City of SyracuseDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2017
  3. United States v. LitvakCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
  4. Carpenters Pension Trust Fund v. Barclays PLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
  5. Washington v. Kellwood Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API