Legal Opinion

United States v. Litvak

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 8, 2015No. 14-2902-CRPublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRAUB, Circuit Judge:

After trial in the District of Connecticut (Janet C. Hall, Chief Judge), a jury convicted Defendant-Appellant Jesse C. Lit-vak of various charges of securities fraud, fraud against the United States, and making false statements. On appeal, Litvak challenges these convictions on several grounds.

First, Litvak contends that, for the purposes of the fraud against the United States and making false statements counts, the evidence adduced at trial provided an insufficient basis for a rational jury to conclude that his misstatements were material to the Department of the…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. United States v. GaudinSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Sohm v. Scholastic Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020
  2. Menaldi v. Och-Ziff Capital Management Group LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
  3. Moody v. CSX Transportation, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2017
  4. Florez v. Central Intelligence AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
  5. United States v. LitvakCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API